FTC Compliance Report Lawyer

In the even that a Respondent fails to take their order compliance obligations seriously, including, but not limited to, timely submitting required reports, can result in the FTC pursuing an enforecement action.  During the pendency of the order, the FTC may require the production of documents, initiate compliance investigations and seek enforcement and the imposition of penalties if Respondents fail to meet their obligations to comply with any term of an order.

What Level of Detail Must be Contained in Compliance Reports?

Compliance reports must include a meaningful level of detail so that any report, including the information and documentation submitted, will be sufficient for the FTC to determine whether Respondents have taken the steps required to comply with each individual provision of the order.

When appropriate, copies of relevant documents or other evidence should be submitted with the reports to demonstrate compliance.  For example, business activities, and  whether and how a Respondent is in compliance with each section of the order.  Reports that are vague, generalized, inaccurate, misleading or conclusory are likely to be deemed insufficient, as may reports that omit relevant information that could affect the FTC’s determination whether the Respondent is fulfilling its obligations under the order.

Reporting requirements are in addition to the substantive obligations of the order, which directly address the Respondent’s alleged legal regulatory violations.  When the Respondent is meeting all of its obligations contained in the order’s affirmative provisions, compliance reports are an important way to confirm that to the FTC.  Where the Respondent has affirmative order obligations with deadlines, or where expeditious compliance is critical to achieving the order’s remedial goal of protecting consumers,  compliance reports are critical to the FTC’s ability to oversee and enforce compliance with an order.

Respondents should expect FTC staff to play an active role in ensuring that parties comply with their reporting obligations.  This is how the FTC determines whether the Respondent is fulfilling its legal obligations and whether the remedy will achieve its purpose.

Contact an Experienced FTC Compliance Report Attorney and Plan Ahead to File Detailed Compliance Reports

Respondents should plan ahead by contacting an experienced FTC compliance report attorney in order to file a detailed and adequate compliance report.  Doing so may go a long way to avoid a potential enforcement action, as well as enable a Respondent to detect and correct areas of possible non-compliance promptly.  Additionally, having no or an inadequate order compliance oversight process can lead to order violations, enforcement actions, and civil penalties.

Failing to submit a complete compliance report can also lead to civil penalties, even in the absence of any violation of the order’s other terms.  Submitting a misleading, incomplete, or seriously deficient report can, in appropriate circumstances, constitute an independent order violation and serve as evidence of bad faith in an order enforcement action for civil penalties and other relief.  If a Respondent submits a conclusory, unsupported, or otherwise deficient report, the FTC can require a supplemental report to correct the deficiency.

Contact an experienced FTC defense lawyer with any questions regarding compliance reporting obligations.

Richard B. Newman is a digital advertising practices attorney at Hinch Newman LLP.  Follow FTC defense lawyer on X.

Informational purposes only. Not legal advice. This article is not intended to and should be construed as a complete summary or discussion of the Rule and all of its obligations and restrictions. May be considered attorney advertising.

Richard B. Newman

Richard B. Newman is a nationally recognized FTC advertising compliance, CID investigation and regulatory enforcemetn attorney. He regularly provides advertising counsel and represents clients in high-profile investigations and enforcement proceedings initiated by the Federal Trade Commission, state attorneys general, departments of consumer affairs, and other federal and state agencies with jurisdiction over advertising and marketing practices. Richard is also an ecommerce lawyer and spam defense attorney. His practice additionally focuses upon false advertising defense, data privacy, cybersquatting, intellectual property law and transactional matters relating to the dissemination of national advertising campaigns, including the gamut of affiliate marketing, telemarketing, lead generation, list management and licensing agreements. Richard advises clients on how to minimize the legal risks associated with digital marketing, email marketing, telemarketing, social media influencer campaigns, endorsements and testimonials, negative option marketing models, native advertising, online promotions and comparative advertising,

To Learn More About This Topic or if You Have Questions, Contact an Experienced FTC Compliance and Defense Lawyer